The distinction between interior architecture vs interior design extends beyond aesthetics, influencing how we perceive space and functionality. Interior design is an art that involves, planning, researching and creating stylish and aesthetically pleasing spaces. People tend to use interior design and interior architecture interchangeably but the two terms refer to different levels of expertise. With interior design, there’s more focus on things such as the final finishes, the colour scheme and the type of furniture chosen. This article delves into the debate of interior architecture vs interior design, shedding light on their unique roles in creating harmonious and functional living environments.
Interior design vs. interior architecture
The main difference between interior design and interior architecture is that interior design focuses on balancing the aesthetic aspect of a space with its function whereas interior architecture involves the structural aspect and creating a functional and innovative design inside out. If you want to personalise your space in a way that doesn’t involve making structural alterations, it’s advisable to get a qualified interior designer so you can design your dream home the way you want it to be.
Another difference is that interior design doesn’t have any strict requirements when it comes to the qualifications required for one to practice while one needs to be licensed to work as an architect. The qualification requirements are more stringent.
There’s also a difference in the scope of work between the two. With interior design, the work involves making existing spaces more aesthetically pleasing whereas the latter is more comprehensive because it involves making structural alterations to building interiors. Some of the structural changes can include changing room functions and moving or replacing walls. This means you’ll need an interior architect for an extension, conversion, or refurbishment project, depending on the type of changes you want to make.
Interior design requires one to have artistic and creative skills whereas interior architecture needs one to have technical skills. You should understand building techniques and requirements to ensure that the structural integrity of the building isn’t compromised.
Finally, with interior design, the project is centred around the client’s needs and objectives or how they plan on using the space whereas, for interior architecture, it’s crucial for one to be conversant with the building codes and regulations to ensure that the structure is safe and functional and to accomplish all of the planning permissions needed. It’s also upon them to choose suitable building materials and techniques.
Comparison table: Interior design vs. interior architecture
The two require skills that are almost similar, however, there are a few distinctive differences. The table below shows the various differences between interior design and interior architecture.
| Interior design | Interior architecture |
|---|---|
| Focuses on aesthetics and improving how a space looks | Involves making structural changes to existing spaces |
| Qualification requirements aren’t as strict | You need to be licensed for you to practise as an interior architect |
| Requires artistic and creative skills | Requires technical skills |
| With interior design, the project is centred around the client’s objectives or needs | With interior design, the project is centred around the client’s objectives or needs |
Understanding the contrast between interior architecture vs interior design is crucial for clients looking to make informed decisions about their space transformation projects. With the above article, you can easily differentiate between the two terms. Also, whether you’re having a new build or renovating your space, you’ll be able to know when you need interior design services and when you need interior architecture.